They must solve a puzzle.įlyn’s book - at least, in the parts about areas reclaimed by nature - details the beauty and wonder of what happens without human interference. My problem with the game was twofold: the player must also add and harvest seeds, and the player must achieve a certain level of growth in order to proceed to the next scene. The fundamental concept of Cloud Gardens is that the player scatters human detritus into a diorama - electronics, furniture, vehicles, structures - and various plants and trees use these as catalysts to spread and grow.
I first played Cloud Gardens just a day or two after finishing Islands of Abandonment and, to be honest, it was for this reason that I initially didn’t like it. Her hope that the planet is not yet beyond saving her hope that in the battle between humanity and nature, there does not need to be a battered and broken loser. Nonetheless, reading Flyn’s detailed accounts gave me a greater understanding of the speed, intricacy, prevalence, and importance of such events. I don’t pretend to understand how this happens and, to be honest, I prefer not knowing. Flyn even records instances of incredibly rare flora and/or fauna appearing in such places where there was no sign before. When given the chance, nature sweeps through our metal and concrete hives with impressive, unstoppable speed and power. One of my biggest learnings from the book is the speed with which such places - houses, factories, entire towns - can look as though they have been abandoned for decades rather than a year or two. It is also largely - for the first half or so of the book, at least - about human spaces that have been abandoned by people, and reclaimed by nature. In order to explain why, I must first talk a little about Cal Flyn’s book Islands of Abandonment, which I've just finished reading.įlyn's book tackles different kinds of abandonment, including people who have abandoned society, and people whom society has abandoned. I’ve recently spent some time playing Cloud Gardens, which serves to support both views, and even to put a positive spin on the latter.
I hold these two truths in my head without conflict. However, when the last of us is gone - be that through our own arrogance, or any other means - the planet will remain. There is no rational way to deny the impact that we have had, and will continue to have, on Earth. Even on the immensely wider scale of humanity itself, we are not as important as we like to think we are. Of the approximately 8 billion people alive today, the percentage that will never know you existed is so high, under any other circumstances you would round it to 100 percent. Countless yesterdays passed millenia before your birth, and tomorrow will come whether you are there to see it or not. “The world doesn’t revolve around you” is the greatest truth you will ever be told. On a wider scale yet, we build and (sadly, more often) break the very planet itself, changing it in ways that could never have come to pass without us. On a wider scale, we all build and break one another’s personalities through our interactions we create one another. Certain surfaces yield to our weight, as we shape the very ground that we walk on. Then there are the footprints that we all leave as we pass through the world, both literal and metaphorical. Everything you see, and how you see it everything you think, and how you think it everything you do, and how you do it it all comes together to produce a perception of the world - the only perception of the world that you have - that never existed before your birth, and will never exist again after your death.
“The world doesn’t revolve around you” is the greatest lie you will ever be told.
0 kommentar(er)
